AdvertiseDonate
Monday, November 2, 2026Local news for Greensboro and North Carolina.
Greensboro Herald · 717 Green Valley Road, Suite 200, Greensboro, NC 27408
Business · New Orleans

Small Business Owners Can Cut Fraud Risk With Basic Controls

Simple accounting practices like separating invoice approval from payment execution offer high-value protection for hospitality firms.

By Lauren Foster ·

Illustration for: Small Business Owners Can Cut Fraud Risk With Basic Controls
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Small business owners in New Orleans face a specific financial threat due to their operational structure. Independent operators in the hospitality sector often run on thin margins with limited staff. This setup creates gaps in financial oversight that fraudsters actively target. The city’s economy relies heavily on these independent businesses, from tour companies to restaurants. Each new seasonal hire or vendor relationship adds a potential point of entry for financial crimes.

Fraud schemes typically exploit the speed and volume of transactions in these businesses. A fake vendor invoice might slip into an accounts payable pile. A spoofed email could direct a bookkeeper to wire money to a new account. Forged checks may clear before discrepancies are noticed. These methods rely on the fact that small teams often lack the bandwidth to verify every single payment request against known contacts.

The Association of Fraud Professionals reports that more than three-quarters of organizations experienced attempted or actual payment fraud in the past year. Business email compromise affected nearly three in four businesses. While these figures cover companies of all sizes, smaller operations often have fewer internal checks to stop the money before it moves. This places significant weight on the few safeguards a small business has in place.

One proven safeguard is the segregation of duties. This control separates invoice approval from payment execution. No single person can both authorize a vendor bill and send the money out. A second set of eyes confirms the invoice matches an actual order and delivery. This process catches altered invoices and fake billing schemes before funds leave the account. Tour operators and restaurant groups can build this discipline into their books using templates developed by businesses in other markets.

The cost of fraud extends beyond the immediate loss of funds. Owners spend time disputing charges with banks and managing strained vendor relationships. Reputational risk increases if customer payment data is involved. For seasonal businesses that earn most revenue during festival months, a fraud incident can wipe out the financial cushion needed for slower periods. Recovering stolen funds is not guaranteed, particularly with wire transfers and check fraud. Prevention therefore offers more value than after-the-fact recovery efforts.

Check fraud remains the most commonly targeted payment method, even as digital banking grows. This is relevant in New Orleans, where many vendors, landlords, and suppliers still prefer paper checks. Smaller firms report fraud losses at lower rates than larger ones, but this may reflect detection limits rather than safety. Smaller accounting teams might simply miss incidents. Fewer than one-fifth of organizations use AI-based fraud tools, leaving basic process discipline as the primary line of defense.

Positive pay services through a bank offer high value for a modest monthly fee. These services flag checks that do not match issued amounts, stopping fraud before it clears. Dual approval requirements for wire transfers and ACH payments cost only the time to set a policy. These requirements close off a common path for business email compromise schemes. Staff should also verify any vendor banking change by phone using a number already on file, rather than the one in the suspicious email.

Owners should prioritize process gaps before purchasing expensive software. Sophisticated detection platforms are wasted on businesses that still allow one employee to approve and pay invoices without review. The better sequence is to fix basic controls first using free or low-cost tools. Paid monitoring tools should be added only after fundamentals are solid. This order of operations stretches a limited budget further than buying technology first.

Practical safeguards can start immediately without a large budget. Reconciling bank statements weekly instead of monthly catches fraudulent transactions while there is still time to dispute them. Setting up alerts for transactions over a set dollar amount gives owners real-time visibility. Rotating who reviews vendor invoices makes it harder for a single compromised login or careless moment to go unnoticed. These habits protect the margins that businesses depend on to survive the local tourism calendar.

Source: Big Easy Magazine

More Business · Scam Watch · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Greensboro Herald in your inboxLocal news for Greensboro and North Carolina. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Get Greensboro Herald in your inboxLocal news for Greensboro and North Carolina. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.