Iran questions Canada's stance on Gulf islands dispute

Esmaeil Baqaei, the spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, challenged Canada's diplomatic position regarding three islands in the Persian Gulf. He argued that Ottawa's support for the United Arab Emirates contradicts the country's own historical defense of its borders.

The dispute centers on Abu Musa, the Greater Tunb, and the Lesser Tunb. Baqaei stated that these landmasses have been part of Iran for millennia. He noted that the UAE federation was not established until 1971, long after the islands were integrated into Iranian territory. He cited historical records and geographical evidence to support Tehran's ownership claim.

Baqaei directed specific criticism at the Canadian Prime Minister for echoing what he termed an absurd claim. He suggested that Canada was engaging in dangerous adventurism by endorsing a territorial dispute it viewed as fabricated.

To illustrate his point, Baqaei referenced Canada's own history of sovereignty. He mentioned the American invasion during the War of 1812. He also cited the Montreal Annexation Manifesto of 1849. Furthermore, he pointed to recent remarks by US President Donald Trump suggesting Canada should become the 51st state.

The spokesman questioned how a nation that spent two centuries defending its territory against a southern neighbor could take sides in a new border dispute. He asked if territorial integrity was a fundamental principle for Canada or only important when its own sovereignty was at risk.

Baqaei concluded his argument by asking if Canada realized it was effectively sawing off the branch on which it sat. He posted these remarks on X on October 31, 2026, addressing the ongoing diplomatic friction between the three nations.

The UAE maintains its claim to the three islands, while Iran asserts its historical ownership. Canada has voiced support for the UAE's position in this specific territorial matter.